Vultr Dallas 2-Core E5-2670 v3 VPS: America's Heartland Delivers Solid Performance πΊπΈ

What's Vultr All About? (Quick Refresher)
So, Vultr... they've been in the game since 2014, and honestly, they're one of those providers that just keeps chugging along without too much drama. Started as a scrappy alternative to the big cloud giants, and now they've got datacenters everywhere - including this Dallas location that I'm about to tear apart (in a good way, hopefully).
Their Dallas datacenter sits right in the heart of America, which makes it pretty solid for US-based projects. I've deployed stuff there before and... well, let's just say it's been mostly smooth sailing. Mostly.
The Hardware Breakdown - What You're Actually Getting π§
Let me just say - this setup surprised me a bit. Here's what we're working with:
Core Specs Overview
Component | Details | Reality Check |
---|---|---|
CPU | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | Actually decent for 2023 |
Cores | 2 vCPU | Sweet spot for most apps |
RAM | 2GB | Could be better, but workable |
Storage | 50GB SSD | Standard fare |
OS | CentOS 7.9 | ~~Modern~~ Getting old but stable |
Virtualization | KVM | Thank god, not OpenVZ |
The E5-2670 v3 is actually a step up from what I've seen lately - it's from 2014, sure, but that extra 100MHz over the v4 variant actually shows up in real-world performance. Plus, the 25MB cache isn't terrible for a 2-core setup.
Running CentOS 7.9 though? Bit of a mixed bag. Rock solid stability, but you're definitely not getting the latest bells and whistles. Perfect if you just want something that works without surprises.
I/O Performance - Decent But Not Spectacular πΎ
I/O Speed Tests:
Run 1: 198 MB/s
Run 2: 221 MB/s
Run 3: 213 MB/s
Average: 210.7 MB/s
210.7 MB/s average is... fine? Not gonna blow your socks off, but it's respectable for this tier. The variation between runs (198-221 MB/s) suggests the storage isn't completely oversold, which is actually a good sign.
I've seen budget providers struggle to hit 100 MB/s, so Vultr's clearly not skimping on the storage infrastructure here. Would I love to see 300+ MB/s? Sure. But for twelve bucks a month, I'm not complaining too loudly.
Network Performance - Here's Where Dallas Shines β‘
Okay, this is where things get interesting. The network tests show exactly why Dallas is such a popular location:
US Performance (Excellent):
- Dallas (local): 591.63 Mbps up / 642.74 Mbps down - Holy moly! π
- Los Angeles: 212.78 Mbps up / 308.65 Mbps down
- New York: 171.32 Mbps up / 256.89 Mbps down
- Toronto: 147.56 Mbps up / 224.17 Mbps down
European Performance (Meh):
- London: 123.41 Mbps up / 198.94 Mbps down
- Amsterdam: 97.12 Mbps up / 176.83 Mbps down
- Frankfurt: 91.48 Mbps up / 162.49 Mbps down
Asia-Pacific Performance (Yawn):
- Tokyo: 71.34 Mbps up / 143.75 Mbps down
- Singapore: 58.75 Mbps up / 109.12 Mbps down
- Sydney: 46.22 Mbps up / 98.17 Mbps down
That 0.98ms latency to Dallas is basically like having the server in your backyard. And those speeds within the US? Chef's kiss. Europe's not terrible either - definitely usable for most applications.
What Should You Use This Thing For? π―
Based on my testing and some real-world experience, here's the honest breakdown:
β This VPS Rocks For:
- US-focused web applications (duh)
- E-commerce sites targeting North America
- Gaming servers for US players (that latency though!)
- Development environments for American teams
- API backends serving US traffic
- WordPress sites with moderate traffic
- Small business applications
β Look Elsewhere If You Need:
- Heavy computational workloads (2 cores ain't cutting it)
- Memory-intensive applications (2GB is tight)
- Primary European/Asian audience (those speeds...)
- High-availability production (single point of failure)
My Actual Experience Using This Setup π
I've been running a client's WordPress site on a similar Dallas Vultr instance for about 8 months now. Traffic's not huge - maybe 5-10k visitors monthly - but it handles the load without breaking a sweat.
Had exactly one outage that I noticed, lasted about 15 minutes back in October. Their status page actually updated in real-time, which was refreshing compared to some providers who pretend nothing happened.
The BBR congestion control is doing its job - connections feel snappy even during peak hours. CentOS 7 might be getting long in the tooth, but it's been rock solid. Zero random crashes or weird behavior.
One complaint? The CPU can bottleneck pretty quickly if you're doing anything intensive. Image processing, video compression, that sort of thing - it'll choke. But for typical web workloads? Golden.
Overall Score: 8.2/10 β
The Good Stuff:
- Fantastic US network performance
- Solid I/O speeds for the price
- Reliable uptime (in my experience)
- KVM virtualization (no weird container issues)
- BBR enabled out of the box
- Dallas location = great US connectivity
The Not-So-Good:
- Limited RAM for modern apps
- Aging CPU (but still decent)
- CentOS 7 is getting old
- European/Asian performance is meh
- ~~Budget~~ Mid-tier pricing
Current Vultr Pricing Structure π³
Configuration | vCPU | RAM | Storage | Transfer | Monthly Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starter | 1 | 1GB | 25GB | 1TB | $6.00 |
Current Setup | 2 | 2GB | 50GB | 2TB | $12.00 |
Performance Bump | 2 | 4GB | 80GB | 3TB | $24.00 |
Serious Business | 4 | 8GB | 160GB | 4TB | $48.00 |
These prices change occasionally because Vultr likes to keep us on our toes
Frequently Asked Questions π€
Q: Can this handle a medium-traffic WordPress site?
A: Yeah, probably. With proper caching (W3 Total Cache or similar) and a CDN, you could probably handle 20-30k monthly visitors. Maybe more if your content isn't too dynamic.
Q: How's Vultr's support these days?
A: Actually not terrible! I've opened maybe 4-5 tickets over the years. Response times are usually under 2 hours, and the techs actually seem to know what they're talking about.
Q: What about backups?
A: They offer automatic snapshots for $1/month per 10GB. Worth it IMO - saved my butt once when I accidentally nuked a database.
Q: Is 2GB RAM really enough in 2024?
A: For basic stuff, yeah. WordPress, small Node.js apps, simple Python scripts - you'll be fine. Docker containers with multiple services? Gonna be tight.
Q: How does this compare to DigitalOcean?
A: Similar performance, slightly better network speeds in my testing. DO has better documentation and tutorials, but Vultr's interface is cleaner.
Q: Can I install Docker on CentOS 7?
A: Yep, works fine. Just be aware you're not getting the latest Docker features since CentOS 7 is pretty conservative with package versions.
Q: What happens if I go over the bandwidth limit?
A: $0.01/GB overage charges. Not terrible, but can add up if you're not careful. They'll email you warnings before it gets expensive.
Q: Any weird restrictions I should know about?
A: Nothing crazy. No crypto mining, no mass emailing, the usual stuff. They're pretty chill compared to some providers.
Q: How's the uptime been?
A: In my experience? Pretty solid. Maybe 99.8-99.9% over the past year. Not perfect, but good enough for most use cases.
Cancellation & Refunds (The Real Talk) πΈ
Here's the deal with Vultr's refund policy - it's... complicated. They don't do traditional money-back guarantees, but they're pretty flexible with account credits if you run into issues early on.
The hourly billing is actually awesome though. Spin up an instance, test it for a few hours, hate it? Destroy it and you're out like 50 cents. Much better than being locked into monthly commitments.
Pro tip: If you're genuinely unhappy with performance, open a support ticket. They've been known to issue credits or help you migrate to a different datacenter without too much hassle.
Real-World Usage Thoughts π
Look, I'm gonna be straight with you - this isn't going to revolutionize your infrastructure. But for $12/month, it's a solid workhorse that'll handle typical small-to-medium business needs without drama.
The Dallas location really shines if your audience is in North America. Those sub-50ms latencies to major US cities are genuinely excellent. Europe's usable, Asia's... well, you get what you get.
If I had to deploy a client project today and they said "we need something reliable in the US for under $15/month," this would definitely be on my shortlist. Not the cheapest, not the fastest, but consistently decent.
Final Verdict π―
The Vultr Dallas 2-core setup hits that sweet spot of "good enough without being exciting." It's like buying a Honda Civic - you know exactly what you're getting, and it's probably going to work without surprises.
Recommend for: US-focused projects, development environments, small business applications, WordPress sites
Skip if: You need cutting-edge performance, lots of RAM, or primarily serve non-US traffic
For twelve bucks a month, you could do a lot worse. The network performance alone makes it worth considering if Dallas works for your use case.
Just... maybe budget for an upgrade if your project takes off. That 2GB RAM ceiling comes up faster than you'd think! π
Review courtesy of: VPSJudge offers real-world VPS hosting reviews, benchmark tests, and expert comparisons to help you choose the right provider.
Want to try Vultr Dallas yourself? Check it out with our affiliate link - helps us keep the lights on for more honest reviews!