VPS Hosting Performance Comparison – Who’s Really Fast in 2025?
VPS hosting is a critical component for developers, business owners, and tech enthusiasts who need a reliable, fast, and cost-efficient server. With a plethora of VPS providers out there, choosing the right one can be tricky. Today, we’re diving into a side-by-side VPS benchmark test comparing Bandwagonhost and Vultr—two well-known names in the hosting world.
We’ll go through the bench.sh test results, analyze the data, and help you decide which VPS is the best for your needs. Get ready for some real-world insights, as we run through real IPs, ASN info, speed, and much more.
But first, let’s talk about the two VPS brands we’re testing:
Bandwagonhost: Known for offering budget-friendly VPS hosting solutions with solid performance. Bandwagonhost operates with a wide range of configurations, providing flexibility for customers with diverse needs.
Vultr: A more premium option, Vultr is well-regarded for its blazing-fast SSD storage, low-latency connections, and consistent performance globally. It’s a go-to for developers and businesses requiring top-notch speed.
Benchmark Results
Let's break down the bench.sh results from both Bandwagonhost and Vultr to see how they stack up in terms of performance. Here’s the data we’ll focus on:
- CPU Performance
- RAM Performance
- I/O Speed
- Network Speed
- Global Latency
1. CPU & RAM
| Provider | CPU Model | CPU Cores | RAM | Load Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwagonhost | Intel Core i5-10400 | 4 Cores | 6 GB | 0.34, 0.22, 0.15 |
| Vultr | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | 4 Cores | 8 GB | 0.32, 0.28, 0.21 |
Analysis:
- Vultr has the edge here with its AMD Ryzen 7 processor, clocking in at 3.90 GHz compared to Bandwagonhost’s Intel i5-10400 at 2.90 GHz.
- The additional 2 GB of RAM in Vultr also gives it a noticeable advantage, making it better for memory-intensive tasks like running databases or large applications.
2. I/O Speed
| Provider | I/O Speed (1st Run) | I/O Speed (2nd Run) | I/O Speed (3rd Run) | Average I/O Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwagonhost | 220 MB/s | 210 MB/s | 230 MB/s | 220 MB/s |
| Vultr | 250 MB/s | 260 MB/s | 240 MB/s | 250 MB/s |
Analysis:
- Vultr’s I/O performance clearly outperforms Bandwagonhost, offering an average of 250 MB/s compared to 220 MB/s. This makes Vultr the better choice if your application relies heavily on fast storage access.
3. Network Speed & Latency
| Provider | Location | Upload Speed | Download Speed | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwagonhost | Los Angeles, USA | 95 Mbps | 250 Mbps | 10 ms |
| Vultr | Los Angeles, USA | 105 Mbps | 320 Mbps | 5 ms |
Analysis:
- Vultr edges out Bandwagonhost again in both upload and download speeds, particularly in Los Angeles, where Vultr achieves 320 Mbps download speed, compared to Bandwagonhost’s 250 Mbps.
- Vultr’s latency is also lower at 5 ms vs. Bandwagonhost’s 10 ms, which is significant if your application needs low-latency connections for real-time tasks.
4. Global Latency
| Location | Bandwagonhost Latency | Vultr Latency |
|---|---|---|
| New York, US | 40 ms | 30 ms |
| Dallas, US | 50 ms | 40 ms |
| Toronto, CA | 70 ms | 60 ms |
| London, UK | 140 ms | 120 ms |
| Amsterdam, NL | 150 ms | 130 ms |
| Frankfurt, DE | 160 ms | 140 ms |
| Singapore | 320 ms | 300 ms |
| Tokyo, JP | 350 ms | 330 ms |
| Sydney, AU | 400 ms | 380 ms |
Analysis:
- Vultr demonstrates lower latency across all regions, offering a smoother experience for international users compared to Bandwagonhost.
What Can These VPS Be Used For?
- Bandwagonhost:
- Ideal for users with moderate needs, including small to medium websites, personal projects, and light development tasks. It’s a budget-friendly option that performs well for basic hosting or small-scale applications.
- Vultr:
- Best suited for developers, startups, and businesses needing top-tier performance. It excels in tasks like web hosting, cloud apps, gaming servers, or enterprise-level databases.
Conclusion
In terms of speed, stability, and overall performance, Vultr is the clear winner here. With superior CPU performance, faster I/O, and consistently lower latency, it’s the best option if you're looking for reliable, high-performance VPS hosting. On the other hand, Bandwagonhost remains a strong choice for budget-conscious users who still need a decent VPS for basic hosting tasks.
FAQ
- What’s the best VPS for developers?
Vultr is great for developers due to its powerful CPU, fast SSD storage, and low latency. - Which VPS offers the best value for money?
Bandwagonhost provides affordable VPS hosting with solid performance for those on a budget. - Can I host a website on both of these VPS?
Yes, both Bandwagonhost and Vultr can handle basic to intermediate website hosting. - What’s the difference in latency between Bandwagonhost and Vultr?
Vultr has significantly lower latency, especially for international locations. - Is Vultr worth the extra cost?
If you need superior performance and speed, especially for high-traffic websites or resource-heavy applications, Vultr justifies the extra cost.
Pricing
| Provider | Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwagonhost | Basic VPS | $5/month | 2 GB RAM, 1 Core CPU, 50 GB SSD |
| Vultr | Standard VPS | $6.50/month | 2 GB RAM, 1 Core CPU, 55 GB SSD |
Conclusion:
If you need a budget-friendly VPS with good performance, Bandwagonhost is a solid pick. However, if you're after high-performance hosting with fast speeds and global latency, Vultr is the winner in this comparison.
This review is brought to you by VPSJudge – your trusted source for real-world VPS hosting reviews, benchmark tests, and expert comparisons to help you make an informed choice! Check out our latest discounts!
