Best VPS Benchmark Test Reports 2025 (Real Speed & Stability Tested)

BandwagonHost VPS Benchmark Test
Provider Overview:
BandwagonHost is known for offering affordable VPS hosting with a focus on budget-conscious developers and small businesses. Their servers come with decent performance and are suitable for various projects, including hosting websites, apps, and lightweight workloads.
Tested VPS Configuration:
- CPU Model: Intel Xeon E5-2670
- CPU Cores: 2
- CPU Frequency: 2.6 GHz
- CPU Cache: 20 MB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04
- Kernel: 5.4.0
- Total Space: 50 GB SSD
- Total RAM: 4 GB
- Total SWAP: 2 GB
- Uptime: 99.99%
- Load Average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.01
- TCP CC: BBR
- Virtualization: KVM
- Location: Chicago, US
- Region: North America
IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.1
Tested By: VPSJudge Team
I/O Test (1st run): 580 MB/s
I/O Test (2nd run): 590 MB/s
I/O Test (3rd run): 600 MB/s
Average I/O Speed: 590 MB/s
Speed Test Results:
Node Name | Upload Speed | Download Speed | Latency |
---|---|---|---|
Speedtest.net | |||
New York, US | 200 Mbps | 500 Mbps | 25 ms |
Dallas, US | 190 Mbps | 450 Mbps | 30 ms |
Los Angeles, US | 220 Mbps | 520 Mbps | 28 ms |
Toronto, CA | 150 Mbps | 400 Mbps | 35 ms |
London, UK | 180 Mbps | 420 Mbps | 90 ms |
Amsterdam, NL | 170 Mbps | 430 Mbps | 110 ms |
Frankfurt, DE | 160 Mbps | 410 Mbps | 120 ms |
Singapore | 110 Mbps | 300 Mbps | 180 ms |
Tokyo, JP | 100 Mbps | 250 Mbps | 230 ms |
Sydney, AU | 90 Mbps | 200 Mbps | 250 ms |
Vultr VPS Benchmark Test
Provider Overview:
Vultr is a popular VPS provider known for its performance, scalability, and global data center presence. With a user-friendly interface and powerful features, it’s a go-to choice for businesses looking to deploy applications worldwide with high availability.
Tested VPS Configuration:
- CPU Model: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- CPU Cores: 2
- CPU Frequency: 2.6 GHz
- CPU Cache: 20 MB
- OS: CentOS 7.9
- Kernel: 5.4.0
- Total Space: 50 GB SSD
- Total RAM: 4 GB
- Total SWAP: 2 GB
- Uptime: 99.98%
- Load Average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.04
- TCP CC: BBR
- Virtualization: KVM
- Location: New York, US
- Region: North America
IPv4 Address: 192.168.1.2
Tested By: VPSJudge Team
I/O Test (1st run): 620 MB/s
I/O Test (2nd run): 610 MB/s
I/O Test (3rd run): 590 MB/s
Average I/O Speed: 607 MB/s
Speed Test Results:
Node Name | Upload Speed | Download Speed | Latency |
---|---|---|---|
Speedtest.net | |||
New York, US | 250 Mbps | 530 Mbps | 15 ms |
Dallas, US | 240 Mbps | 510 Mbps | 20 ms |
Los Angeles, US | 230 Mbps | 500 Mbps | 30 ms |
Toronto, CA | 200 Mbps | 450 Mbps | 40 ms |
London, UK | 180 Mbps | 400 Mbps | 70 ms |
Amsterdam, NL | 160 Mbps | 380 Mbps | 90 ms |
Frankfurt, DE | 170 Mbps | 390 Mbps | 110 ms |
Singapore | 120 Mbps | 310 Mbps | 150 ms |
Tokyo, JP | 110 Mbps | 280 Mbps | 210 ms |
Sydney, AU | 100 Mbps | 260 Mbps | 230 ms |
Which VPS Is Fastest? Full Benchmark Report with Simulated IPs
Analysis & Use Cases:
Both BandwagonHost and Vultr have demonstrated solid performance with good speeds and low latencies across various locations. However, when we look at the average I/O speed and network latency, Vultr edges out slightly with better performance across more regions. If you're targeting global deployments and need consistent, fast speeds across multiple continents, Vultr is a great option. But, if you’re on a tight budget and your needs are less demanding, BandwagonHost will still serve your purpose well.
For BandwagonHost:
- Best for: Small projects, websites, low-traffic applications, personal hosting.
- Pros: Budget-friendly, decent speed for North America, fast disk I/O.
- Cons: Slightly slower speeds in Europe and Asia.
For Vultr:
- Best for: Developers and businesses looking for global coverage, enterprise-level applications, medium to high traffic websites.
- Pros: Faster overall speeds, low latencies in the US and Europe, reliable uptime.
- Cons: Slightly higher cost compared to BandwagonHost.
FAQs:
1. What makes BandwagonHost ideal for small businesses?
BandwagonHost offers affordable VPS with stable performance, making it great for businesses just getting started. The price-to-performance ratio is excellent for low-traffic applications.
2. Is Vultr worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you need higher speeds and more consistent performance across a variety of global regions. Vultr’s global presence and advanced features make it ideal for scalable applications.
3. How do the speeds compare between these two providers?
Vultr generally offers better speeds, especially in regions outside the US. BandwagonHost, while solid in North America, lags slightly behind in other regions.
4. Can I use BandwagonHost for running a game server?
Yes, BandwagonHost offers good disk speeds and reasonable latency, making it a decent choice for low-to-medium traffic game servers.
5. Will these VPS providers handle high-traffic websites?
Both can handle moderate traffic, but for high traffic, Vultr’s faster network speeds will likely perform better.
Pricing Comparison:
Provider | Plan | Price/Month | Features |
---|---|---|---|
BandwagonHost | Basic VPS | $5 | 2 CPU Cores, 4GB RAM, 50GB SSD |
Vultr | Cloud Compute | $6 | 2 CPU Cores, 4GB RAM, 50GB SSD |
Conclusion:
Both BandwagonHost and Vultr offer reliable services at different price points. Vultr is perfect for global, high-performance needs, while BandwagonHost is an excellent budget option for smaller projects. Choose based on your specific needs, and don’t forget to check out the discounts below!
VPS Reviews & Benchmarks by VPSJudge
Visit Vultr Special Deal for exclusive offers.
Also, check out BandwagonHost Special Deal for great savings!