AccuWebHosting vs VPSServer VPS Review: Geekbench, iperf & Sysbench Benchmark

AccuWebHosting vs VPSServer VPS Review: Geekbench, iperf & Sysbench Benchmark

Meta Description: In-depth VPS benchmark for AccuWebHosting and VPSServer using Geekbench, iperf, and Sysbench. Real-world performance data with use-case analysis.

🧪 VPS Test Background

Ever found yourself lost in the ocean of VPS providers, not knowing what actually works and what just looks good on paper? Yeah, same here. So, I spun up a couple of instances from AccuWebHosting and VPSServer to see how they really perform.

TL;DR

  • 🔍 Test Tools: Geekbench 6, iperf3, sysbench CPU & I/O
  • 🌎 Locations: Dallas, US (AccuWebHosting) & Frankfurt, DE (VPSServer)
  • 📦 Configs: Mid-tier (2 vCPU, 4GB RAM, SSD)

📊 Geekbench 6 Results

AccuWebHosting - Dallas, TX, USA

Geekbench 6.3.0
Single-Core Score: 1065
Multi-Core Score: 2054

CPU Info: Intel Xeon Gold 6338
RAM: 4 GB DDR4 ECC

Tested IP: 192.241.215.33 (ASN: AS32751 – INAP)

VPSServer - Frankfurt, Germany

Geekbench 6.3.0
Single-Core Score: 1322
Multi-Core Score: 2457

CPU Info: AMD EPYC 7452
RAM: 4 GB DDR4

Tested IP: 88.198.92.45 (ASN: AS24940 – Hetzner Online GmbH)

🚀 Network Benchmark (iperf3)

Provider Location Upload (Mbps) Download (Mbps) Latency (ms)
AccuWebHosting Dallas, TX 702 784 21.3
VPSServer Frankfurt, DE 922 1055 13.8

⚙️ Sysbench Test Results

AccuWebHosting - CPU & Disk I/O

CPU Test (1-thread): 10.3s
File I/O: 230 MB/s (seq wr), 192 MB/s (rand wr)

VPSServer - CPU & Disk I/O

CPU Test (1-thread): 8.6s
File I/O: 278 MB/s (seq wr), 210 MB/s (rand wr)

🏷️ Quick Intro to the Brands

AccuWebHosting

Established US-based hosting since 2002. Known for reliability & range of Windows/Linux VPS options. Check them out.

VPSServer

High-performance cloud VPS provider with global locations & decent DDoS protection. Good for DevOps-y stuff. More info here.


🤹 Real-World Use Case Thoughts

  • AccuWebHosting: Perfect if you’re in the US and need a low-latency Windows VPS for RDP or accounting tools. But yeah, network speeds feel a bit throttled.
  • VPSServer: Definitely shines for devs running CI/CD or small game servers. Fast disk = fast builds.
Personal note: Setting up Docker on VPSServer felt buttery smooth, while Accu's panel looked a little... early 2010s?

📌 Pricing Snapshot

Plan AccuWebHosting (US) VPSServer (DE)
2 vCPU / 4GB $13.99/mo $10.00/mo
4 vCPU / 8GB $26.99/mo $18.00/mo

Cancellation & Refunds:
AccuWeb offers 7-day money-back for Linux VPS. VPSServer? Kinda iffy. You can cancel anytime but no refunds on trial promos.


🔍 Data Breakdown & Subjective Rambling

  • VPSServer kinda smoked AccuWebHosting in network and I/O.
  • Accu had better support replies tho (like, within 10 mins).
  • Location bias? Maybe. Dallas node had more jitter.
  • For production? I’d go VPSServer. For something stable & support-heavy? Accu.

❓ FAQ - You Might Be Wondering

  1. Is VPSServer better than AccuWebHosting?
    Depends! For raw speed? VPSServer. For handholding? Accu.
  2. Which has better panel UX?
    VPSServer's feels snappier. Accu’s is... solid but old-school.
  3. Can I run Docker?
    Yes on both. VPSServer felt faster building images.
  4. How’s the uptime?
    No drops over 7 days for either. Promising.
  5. Hidden fees?
    Didn’t find any. But always read the fine print, y'know?
  6. Backups included?
    Optional on both. Manual snapshots are your friend.
  7. Do they offer root access?
    Yes, full root outta the box.
  8. Is IPv6 supported?
    Yep. Accu provides it by request. VPSServer auto-enables.
  9. Which one’s better for game servers?
    VPSServer wins with lower latency and higher I/O.
  10. Can I upgrade later?
    Easy scaling on both. VPSServer was a bit more seamless.

🤹‍♂️ Actual User Experience

After ~10 days of light-to-moderate use:
  • AccuWebHosting: No downtime, great support, meh network.
  • VPSServer: Faster than I expected. UI responsive. Setup under 3 mins.
**VPSServer had me thinking — why pay more when it's snappy and stable?**

Oh, and I ran a small Django site on both. Page load times:

  • Accu: 630ms avg
  • VPS: 470ms avg

🧾 Final Verdict

VPSServer: Best for devs, projects needing fast I/O, global reach.
👍 AccuWebHosting: Solid if you’re new or prefer strong support in the US.

👉 Grab them here:


📢 Testing by: VPSJudge offers real-world VPS hosting reviews, benchmark tests, and expert comparisons to help you choose the right provider.


✍️ About the Author

Senior VPS Reviewer | Linux Architect | Network Infrastructure Consultant
Expertise

🔍 Global VPS Reviews: 10+ yrs, 500+ providers, performance/network/I/O/cost analysis
🐧 Linux Optimization: High-concurrency architectures, kernel tuning, KVM & containers (Docker/K8s)
🌐 Network Solutions: CDN acceleration, TCP/IP stack, DDoS mitigation, edge nodes
Certifications
LPIC-3 · CCNP · AWS SAP · CKA
Key Projects
📊 Global VPS Performance Map: Auto-monitoring 30+ country nodes, quarterly industry reports
⚡ Million-concurrency Hybrid CDN: Reduced latency 47%, saved $220K+/yr bandwidth
✍️ Tech Columnist: 60+ in-depth articles on Phoronix/LowEndTalk

Read more