AccuWebHosting vs Kamatera: Budget VPS Benchmarks & Real-World Speed Tests

AccuWebHosting vs Kamatera: Budget VPS Benchmarks & Real-World Speed Tests

Intro
Hey folks! Today we’re pitin’ two budget VPS providers—AccuWebHosting (affiliate link) and Kamatera (affiliate link)—against each other. We spun up their entry-tier VPS in New York (AccuWeb) and London (Kamatera) to simulate real user loads. Benchmarks focus on speed, reliability, and "what can ya actually run?" Spoiler: one’s a speed demon, the other’s a wallet-saver 😉.


🔍 AccuWebHosting Bench.sh Test (New York)

Server Config:

  • CPU: 2 vCores (Intel Xeon E5-2680 @ 2.4GHz)
  • RAM: 4GB DDR4
  • Storage: 50GB SSD
  • IP: 192.184.83.105 (ASN: AS36352 ColoCrossing)

bench.sh Output:

CPU Model     : Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2  
CPU Cores     : 2 @ 2399.998 MHz  
Disk Speed    : 187.3 MB/s (Write) | 220.1 MB/s (Read)  
Speedtest (NY):  
    NYC   : 89.24 ms | ↓ 482.31 Mbps | ↑ 319.76 Mbps  
    LAX   : 72.15 ms | ↓ 421.88 Mbps | ↑ 298.12 Mbps  
    LON   : 98.33 ms | ↓ 264.55 Mbps | ↑ 201.44 Mbps  
    TYO   : 183.71 ms | ↓ 89.21 Mbps | ↑ 77.34 Mbps  

Analysis:

  • Disk I/O: Solid for a budget box! ~200 MB/s means no laggy WordPress installs.
  • Network: Crazy good in the US (↑300 Mbps uploads?!), but intercontinental drops hard. Tokyo at ↓89 Mbps? Oof.
  • Use Cases: Perfect for small biz sites, lightweight databases, or a personal VPN. Not for heavy video streaming tho.

Real Experience:
Setup took like 10 mins, and their dashboard’s kinda old-school but functional. Once, the network flaked for 2 mins during peak hours—support blamed "upstream issues" 🤷‍♂️. Still, $5/month ain’t bad!


🌍 Kamatera Bench.sh Test (London)

Server Config:

  • CPU: 2 vCores (Intel Platinum 8276 @ 2.2GHz)
  • RAM: 4GB DDR4
  • Storage: 50GB SSD
  • IP: 45.128.222.77 (ASN: AS12876 Kamatera)

bench.sh Output:

CPU Model     : Intel Platinum 8276  
CPU Cores     : 2 @ 2199.990 MHz  
Disk Speed    : 318.7 MB/s (Write) | 401.5 MB/s (Read) 💥  
Speedtest (LON):  
    LON   : 3.22 ms  | ↓ 891.44 Mbps | ↑ 845.33 Mbps  
    FRA   : 14.87 ms | ↓ 623.11 Mbps | ↑ 587.90 Mbps  
    NYC   : 79.51 ms | ↓ 376.45 Mbps | ↑ 330.21 Mbps  
    SIN   : 189.02 ms| ↓ 203.67 Mbps | ↑ 188.54 Mbps  

Analysis:

  • Disk I/O: 400+ MB/s reads?! This ain’t your grandma’s SSD.
  • Network: EU performance is wild (↓891 Mbps in London!). US speeds hold up decently—NYC at ↓376 Mbps is usable.
  • Use Cases: Handles multi-region apps, medium-traffic e-commerce, or even game servers. RAM’s the bottleneck here.

Real Experience:
Kamatera’s cloud panel feels slick—scaling RAM took 2 clicks. But dang, their pricing’s confusing! I got charged extra for "CPU bursts." Support clarified, but still… watch those hidden costs 👀.


💬 FAQ: 7 Burning Questions

  1. Q: Which is better for US users?
    A: AccuWebHosting if you’re only targeting NA. Kamatera if you need transatlantic reach.
  2. Q: Can I host a Minecraft server?
    A: On Kamatera? Yes (if <10 players). AccuWeb? Maybe… but prepare for lag spikes.
  3. Q: Do they allow torrenting?
    A: AccuWeb = ❌ (strict TOS). Kamatera = ✅ (but don’t hog bandwidth).
  4. Q: IPv6 support?
    A: Kamatera: yes. AccuWeb: not on the $5 plan.
  5. Q: Backup policies?
    A: Both charge extra ($2-5/month). Always DIY backups!

⚖️ Cancellation & Refunds

  • AccuWebHosting: 15-day refund. Cancels via ticket (takes 24h).
  • Kamatera: No refunds after 30 days. Insta-cancel in dashboard (but they’ll bill ya for partial months).

💰 Pricing Comparison

Plan AccuWebHosting Kamatera
Entry Tier $5/month $6/month*
CPU 2 vCores 2 vCores
Bandwidth 1TB 5TB
Setup Fee $0 $0
Hidden Costs None Burstable CPU fees

*Kamatera’s base is $4, but our tested config averaged $6 after "burstable" usage.


🧠 Final Verdict

  • AccuWebHosting (link): Budget king for US-focused projects. Just don’t expect miracles overseas.
  • Kamatera (link): Speed monster in EU/global. Worth the extra $$ if disk I/O and latency matter.

Neither’s perfect—AccuWeb’s network hiccups and Kamatera’s pricing quirks are real. But for under $10/month? Solid options.


This review is brought to you by VPSJudge. We offer real-world VPS hosting reviews, benchmark tests, and expert comparisons to help you choose the right provider. No sugarcoatin’—just raw data 💪.

(Note: Tests ran on April 12, 2025. Speeds vary by location/time. Affiliate links support our work—thx!)

Read more