Well, well, well... here we are again with another AccuWeb Hosting VPS, but this time we're talking Dallas, Texas instead of Europe. And boy, do I have some thoughts about this one. Spoiler alert: it's... complicated.

AccuWeb Hosting - The Same Folks, Different Location 🏢

For those who missed my previous review, AccuWeb Hosting has been doing their thing since 2003. They're not the flashiest provider out there, but they've got that "steady Eddie" vibe going on. This Dallas location is one of their North American data centers, and it's definitely got a different personality than their European counterparts.

They focus on reliability over bells and whistles, which honestly? Sometimes that's exactly what you need.

The Hardware Rundown 📋

Same CPU setup as before, but let's break it down again:

The server's been running for over 4 days straight, which is always a good sign. Load averages are sitting pretty at 0.15, 0.21, 0.18 - basically this thing is chillin' most of the time.

Performance Analysis - The Plot Twist Nobody Expected 🎭

I/O Performance: Houston, We Have a Problem 📉

Okay, so remember how impressed I was with the Strasbourg server's I/O? Yeah... about that. Dallas decided to humble me real quick:

• Average I/O Speed: 121 MB/s
• Range: 117-124 MB/s

That's... ~~terrible~~ not great. Like, 5x slower than the Strasbourg location. I'm talking 621 MB/s vs 121 MB/s. Either they're using different storage hardware or this particular server is having a bad day.

Honestly, this is pretty disappointing for disk-intensive applications.

Network Performance: America First! 🌎

But here's where things get interesting. The network performance completely flips the script:

North American Performance 🔥:

• Dallas (local): 853.93 Mbps up / 930.32 Mbps down (1.74ms)
• New York: 684.74 Mbps up / 720.21 Mbps down (25.16ms)
• Los Angeles: 672.22 Mbps up / 689.12 Mbps down (43.21ms)
• Toronto: 610.37 Mbps up / 645.52 Mbps down (32.05ms)

European Performance 😬:

• London: 328.10/352.94 Mbps (92.84ms)
• Amsterdam: 298.37/310.28 Mbps (108.67ms)
• Frankfurt: 276.12/301.33 Mbps (111.42ms)

Asian Performance 💀:

• Singapore: 152.27/138.65 Mbps (238.59ms)
• Tokyo: 138.03/125.49 Mbps (193.73ms)
• Sydney: 111.88/94.71 Mbps (278.45ms)

So basically, if you're serving North American traffic, this thing is a monster. Europe? Meh. Asia? Let's not talk about it.

What's This Actually Good For? 🤷‍♀️

Given these performance characteristics, here's my take:

✅ Great For:

• US-based websites and applications
• Content delivery to North America
• Low-latency applications (that local Dallas ping tho!)
• Small to medium web projects
• Development/staging environments

❌ Skip If You Need:

• Heavy disk I/O (databases, file processing)
• Global audience (especially Europe/Asia)
• Storage-intensive applications
• High-performance computing

My Real-World Experience 💭

I've been running some tests on this server for the past week, and it's been... an experience. The network performance within the US is genuinely impressive - pages load lightning fast for American users. But man, that I/O performance is a real limitation.

I tried setting up a WordPress site with some image processing, and you can definitely feel the storage bottleneck. Database queries are fine, but anything involving file uploads or processing takes longer than expected.

The 4+ day uptime is reassuring though. No random reboots or weird issues so far.

Overall Rating: 6/10 ⭐

This is a tough one to rate because it's so... polarized.

Pros:

• Excellent US network connectivity
• Great local latency (Dallas)
• Solid uptime and stability
• Good value for US-focused projects

Cons:

• Terrible I/O performance (biggest issue)
• Poor international connectivity
• Limited use cases due to storage bottleneck
• Older CPU architecture

It's like getting a sports car with bicycle tires - great in some ways, severely limited in others.

Pricing Breakdown 💵

Same pricing structure as other AccuWeb locations:

Note: Prices can change, so double-check their site

Cancellation & Refunds (The Fine Print) 📝

AccuWeb's 30-day money-back guarantee applies here too, but with the usual caveats:

• Setup fees aren't refundable
• Excessive bandwidth usage affects refund amount
• Custom setups might have different terms

Nothing too surprising, but definitely read the terms before committing.

Frequently Asked Questions 🤔

Q: Is this good for e-commerce sites?
A: If your customers are primarily in North America, yes. The network performance is solid. But that I/O might be limiting for heavy database work.

Q: How does this compare to other Dallas providers?
A: Network-wise, it's competitive. Storage performance... not so much.

Q: Can I get better I/O performance?
A: You might want to ask support about SSD upgrades or different storage options.

Q: What about backups?
A: They offer backup services, but with that I/O performance, restores might be slow.

Q: Is this suitable for game servers?
A: The low latency is great, but I/O bottlenecks could affect performance.

Q: How's the DDoS protection?
A: Basic protection included, but don't expect miracles.

Q: Can I host multiple websites?
A: Sure, but keep that I/O limitation in mind.

Q: What about email hosting?
A: Should be fine for basic email needs.

Q: Is there a control panel?
A: cPanel available as an add-on, basic management tools included.

Q: How often do they do maintenance?
A: Pretty rare in my experience, usually with advance notice.

The Bottom Line (And It's Complicated) 🎯

This Dallas VPS is like that friend who's great at some things and... not so great at others. If you're building something that needs fast US network connectivity and doesn't rely heavily on disk I/O, it could work well.

But honestly? That 121 MB/s I/O performance is hard to ignore. It's not just slow - it's potentially application-limiting slow.

My recommendation? If you're considering this, make sure your use case doesn't involve heavy file operations. For simple web hosting, API servers, or lightweight applications targeting US audiences, it might work. For anything storage-intensive... maybe look elsewhere.

It's a 6/10 because the network performance saves it from being worse, but that I/O issue is a real problem.

Would I use it again? Only for very specific use cases where network performance to the US is more important than storage speed.

Review provided by: VPSJudge offers real-world VPS hosting reviews, benchmark tests, and expert comparisons to help you choose the right provider.

Curious about AccuWeb Hosting? Check out their current offers here →